Testland
Browse all skills & agents

evidently-monitoring

Use Evidently OSS (100+ evaluation metrics, declarative testing API) to detect data drift, target drift, and model-performance regression, wired into CI as a gate (a Report run with include_tests) and into production monitoring as a continuous check; reports as HTML + JSON for both human review and pipeline assertions. Includes a drift-alert triage playbook: classify the fired alert's signal, rank root-cause hypotheses (upstream schema change, pipeline bug, training-serving skew, seasonality, genuine population shift), and pick rollback, retrain, quarantine, or alert re-tuning. Use when you need a drift or quality gate, a scheduled monitoring job, or a structured triage of a fired drift alert, for a tabular ML model. Built on the Evidently API specifically: for DeepChecks-based validation suites use deepchecks-tests instead.

Install with skills.sh (any agent)

npx skills add testland/qa --skill evidently-monitoring
View source

evidently-monitoring

Evidently is "an open-source Python library with over 40+ million downloads. It provides 100+ evaluation metrics, a declarative testing API, and a lightweight visual interface" per Evidently docs (opens in new window).

When to use

  • Pre-deployment gate: assert no data/target drift between candidate-model evaluation set and the production reference.
  • Production monitoring: scheduled job comparing yesterday's traffic vs the reference window.
  • Triage tool: when a model misbehaves in prod, run an Evidently Report comparing the bad period to a known-good window.

How to use

  1. pip install evidently into the CI or monitoring environment (Step 1).
  2. Load a pinned reference dataset and the current dataset as pandas DataFrames (Step 2).
  3. Run Report([DataDriftPreset()]) with run(reference_data=, current_data=) and save_html for review (Step 3).
  4. For a CI gate, add include_tests=True, read .dict()["tests"], and raise SystemExit on any FAIL/ERROR (Step 4).
  5. Add RegressionPreset / ClassificationPreset when prediction + target columns exist, to catch performance regression (Step 5).
  6. Wrap the gated Report in a daily scheduled job comparing yesterday's traffic to the pinned reference, notifying on-call on failure (Step 6).
  7. Tune the per-column drift method (psi, etc.) and severity tiers so critical drift blocks and minor drift only alerts (Step 4).

Step 1 - Install

pip install evidently

See the canonical install page at https://docs.evidentlyai.com/docs/setup/installation for the current install options (pip install evidently, plus the evidently[llm] extra).

Step 2 - Reference + current datasets

The standard pattern compares two datasets:

  • Reference - known-good baseline (e.g., training data, last validated production window).
  • Current - what you're checking (candidate model eval set, or current production traffic).
import pandas as pd

reference_df = pd.read_parquet("reference.parquet")
current_df = pd.read_parquet("current.parquet")

Step 3 - Run a drift Report

from evidently import Report
from evidently.presets import DataDriftPreset

# The current API takes the preset list positionally; run() with keyword
# args is unambiguous about which dataset is which (per [Evidently Report]).
report = Report([DataDriftPreset()])
my_eval = report.run(reference_data=reference_df, current_data=current_df)
my_eval.save_html("drift_report.html")

Result: HTML dashboard + structured JSON. Per Evidently docs (opens in new window), the preset bundles per-feature drift detection with sane defaults.

Step 4 - Gate CI on the drift tests

In the current Evidently API there is no separate TestSuite class. You enable per-column pass/fail tests by passing include_tests=True to the Report, then read each test's status from the result, per Evidently Report (opens in new window):

from evidently import Report
from evidently.presets import DataDriftPreset

# include_tests=True turns the preset's per-column drift metrics into
# pass/fail tests alongside the metrics.
report = Report([DataDriftPreset()], include_tests=True)
my_eval = report.run(reference_data=reference_df, current_data=current_df)

# .dict() exposes top-level "metrics" and "tests" only - there is NO
# top-level "status" key. Gate on any test that did not pass.
result = my_eval.dict()
failed = [t for t in result["tests"] if t.get("status") in ("FAIL", "ERROR")]
if failed:
    raise SystemExit(
        f"Evidently drift gate failed: {len(failed)} test(s); see drift_report.html"
    )

Evidently's drift detection supports several statistical methods (psi, wasserstein, ks, chisquare, jensenshannon); PSI is conventional for tabular production drift. Configure the method and threshold per column on the preset or the dataset's data definition, per Evidently drift preset (opens in new window).

Step 5 - Model-performance presets

from evidently.presets import RegressionPreset, ClassificationPreset

# Regression
report = Report([RegressionPreset()])
report.run(reference_data=ref, current_data=cur).save_html("regression.html")

# Classification
report = Report([ClassificationPreset()])
report.run(reference_data=ref, current_data=cur).save_html("classification.html")

Requires both prediction and target columns in both DataFrames.

Step 6 - Schedule in production

# Daily monitoring job
import datetime
from pathlib import Path

today = datetime.date.today().isoformat()
current_df = load_production_window(start=today, days=1)
reference_df = load_reference_window()

report = Report([DataDriftPreset()], include_tests=True)
result = report.run(reference_data=reference_df, current_data=current_df)
result.save_html(Path(f"monitoring/{today}.html"))

if any(t.get("status") in ("FAIL", "ERROR") for t in result.dict()["tests"]):
    notify_oncall(f"Data drift detected on {today}")

Pair with a scheduler (Airflow / Prefect / cron / Argo Workflows).

Step 7 - Triage a fired drift alert

When the Step 6 job pages, triage the alert before acting - never jump straight to retrain or rollback.

Parse the alert envelope. Read the JSON report (report.dict() returns the run as a dictionary per Evidently output formats (opens in new window)). Each column is scored by a drift method against a threshold; defaults are PSI and Jensen-Shannon divergence at threshold 0.1, KS and chi-square at p-value 0.05, per Evidently customization docs (opens in new window). Dataset-level drift triggers when the share of drifted columns reaches drift_share: "By default, Dataset Drift is detected if at least 50% of columns drift" per Evidently drift preset (opens in new window). Note which columns drifted and which stat test fired.

Classify the drift signal:

SignalLook for
Broad feature drift (many columns)Schema/ETL change or population shift
Single-column drift, especially an ID or timestampPipeline bug or upstream encoding change
Target/prediction drift without feature driftConcept drift or label-pipeline failure
Drift that aligns with calendar (weekend, holiday, season)Seasonality - not a model failure
Drift only in serving data, not in a held-out eval setTraining-serving skew

Rank root-cause hypotheses (default likelihood order in practice; adjust on the signal evidence) and act per hypothesis:

  1. Upstream schema change - a feed column renamed, retyped, or dropped. Diff the upstream schema against a reference snapshot; fix the feature pipeline; re-run the report before returning the model to live traffic.
  2. Pipeline bug - a join key, fill-value, or preprocessing step changed. Check deploy timestamps against drift onset; roll back the coinciding deploy; quarantine predictions from the affected window; add a per-column CI drift gate for the affected column.
  3. Training-serving skew - the live feature path diverges from the training path (different imputation or aggregation window). Align serving feature code with the training job, then regenerate the reference dataset from the corrected serving path.
  4. Seasonality - known calendar or business-cycle effect. Corroborate with a year-over-year window or business calendar first; then widen the affected columns' thresholds (or switch stat test) via per-column configuration per Evidently customization docs (opens in new window), and document the pattern as a known-good deviation.
  5. Genuine population shift - the data-generating process changed (new product line, user segment, regulation). Retrain on a window that includes the new population; re-run the fairness gating workflow in model-risk-evidence-matrix on the retrained candidate (fairness metrics shift with population); update the reference dataset only after successful promotion.

Triage discipline:

  • Cite the report data (columns, stat tests, onset timestamp) behind every hypothesis; no rollback or quarantine call without the columns and onset time that substantiate it.
  • Never classify an alert as seasonality without corroborating evidence (year-over-year window, business calendar, or a prior documented pattern).
  • Never retrain before ruling out hypotheses 1-3: retraining on drifted input without fixing the upstream cause embeds the bug in the new model.

Worked example

A team ships a weekly retrain of a tabular fraud classifier and wants CI to block a release whose input distribution has moved too far from the validated baseline.

  1. reference.parquet holds the last validated production week (~400k rows); current.parquet holds the candidate model's eval slice.
  2. The CI step runs a gated drift Report:
from evidently import Report
from evidently.presets import DataDriftPreset

report = Report([DataDriftPreset()], include_tests=True)
result = report.run(reference_data=reference_df, current_data=current_df)
result.save_html("drift_report.html")

failed = [t for t in result.dict()["tests"] if t.get("status") in ("FAIL", "ERROR")]
if failed:
    raise SystemExit(f"Evidently drift gate failed: {len(failed)} test(s)")
  1. Two columns (transaction_amount, merchant_country) drift past their PSI threshold, so their tests report FAIL.
  2. raise SystemExit fails the CI job; drift_report.html is uploaded as a build artifact showing the two drifted distributions.
  3. The engineer confirms merchant_country gained a new region, widens that column's threshold (or retrains on data that includes it), and the re-run passes.

Anti-patterns

Anti-patternWhy it failsFix
Use yesterday as reference (rolling window only)Slow drifts go undetected (model degrades 1% per day for 100 days = 100% drift)Pin a stable reference (Step 2)
Run only on training dataTraining data is curated; never reflects real production distributionUse real production samples (Step 6)
Default thresholds for all metricsDefaults are textbook; production tolerance differsTune per-feature thresholds (Step 4)
Block deploy on every driftHigh-traffic production shifts daily; team disables monitorSeverity tiers: critical drift blocks; minor drift alerts
Skip target/prediction driftConcept drift (inputs stable, output behavior changed) goes undetectedInclude the target/prediction column in the drift check (Steps 3-4)

Limitations

  • 100+ metrics doesn't mean every domain. Healthcare/finance fairness metrics often need pairing with fairlearn-fairness skill.
  • Memory: full preset on millions of rows can OOM. Sample to 100k - 1M before passing.

References

Related skills

deepchecks-tests

Run Deepchecks suites (data integrity, train-test validation, model evaluation) on tabular / NLP / vision data + models. Pass `result.passed_conditions()` to CI to gate on regressions; the same checks run during research, CI, and production monitoring per the Deepchecks lifecycle posture. Use before training to catch train-test leakage and data-integrity defects in a tabular, NLP, or vision dataset, and to re-run the same suite on production samples to detect drift.

fairlearn-fairness

Compute group fairness metrics (selection rate, demographic parity, equalized odds) per sensitive feature with `MetricFrame`, then mitigate disparities using Reductions algorithms (`ExponentiatedGradient` with constraint = `DemographicParity`/`EqualizedOdds`). Wire group-disaggregated assertions into the model-evaluation gate. Use when a model's decisions affect people and a stakeholder, auditor, or regulation (ECOA, GDPR Art. 22, EU AI Act high-risk) requires evidence of per-group outcomes, or when someone reports the model treats a specific group worse.

giskard-tests

Test ML models with Giskard's scan() vulnerability detector + test catalog (performance, robustness, fairness, data leakage, ethical issues) for tabular and NLP models. Wrap a prediction function in giskard.Model + a DataFrame in giskard.Dataset; emit test suites that pass/fail in CI. Use when a trained tabular or NLP model is about to ship with no test suite of its own, or when a feature-engineering or hyperparameter change needs a pre-merge scan for newly introduced vulnerabilities.

model-performance-regression-gate

Computes held-out metrics (accuracy, F1, AUC, RMSE) for a retrained model and compares them against the current production model, failing promotion when any metric regresses beyond a configured tolerance. Adds per-segment checks via Deepchecks WeakSegmentsPerformance so a model that improves globally but regresses on a key slice is still blocked. Use when a retrained model is a candidate for promotion and the CI pipeline must enforce a per-metric pass/fail gate before the artifact is pushed to the model registry.

model-risk-evidence-matrix

Assigns an ML model to a low, medium, or high risk tier from what its predictions decide about people, then derives the fairness and explainability evidence that tier must produce: group metrics per declared sensitive feature, intersectional breakdowns with per-cell counts, vulnerability scan categories, a drift monitoring plan, and per-prediction explanation logs. Supplies conventional demographic parity difference bands, a per-vulnerability-category blocking table, evidence rules marking a bundle incomplete or self-contradicting, and a fairness gating workflow that walks a candidate's model card + evidence bundle to a promote / needs-work / block verdict with refuse rules; a reference covers producing the explanation records with Alibi Explain. Use when a model release candidate is up for promotion and someone must decide which fairness artifacts are mandatory, when a declared risk tier's evidence bundle must be checked against what the tier demands, or when the evidence review must gate the promotion.

notebook-ci-pipeline-author

The single home for Jupyter notebook testing: wires parameterized execution (papermill), output regression (nbval), function-level unit tests (testbook), output stripping (nbstripout), and artifact upload into one working GitHub Actions CI pipeline, with per-tool depth for papermill (parameters tag, CLI/API, sweeps) and nbval (strict/lax modes, per-cell markers, sanitize config) in references/. Includes a notebook PR review checklist covering untested notebooks, --nbval-lax misuse, hardcoded credentials, non-deterministic output cells, missing parameters tags, and committed outputs, with BLOCK / WARN / INFO severities and a BLOCK-or-PASS verdict. Use when notebooks must run as parameterized regression jobs in CI, when a repo ships .ipynb files whose outputs must stay stable, or when a PR that adds or modifies notebooks needs a structured quality review.