flutter-testing
Authors Flutter tests across the three-layer pyramid - unit (`flutter test`), widget (`testWidgets` + `WidgetTester`), integration (`integration_test` on simulator/emulator/device). Picks the right layer per change, mocks via `mockito` + `build_runner`, LCOV coverage, CI with the Flutter Action. Use when the app is Flutter and the team wants its first-party stack. For React Native use detox-testing; for black-box cross-platform use appium-testing; for YAML-declarative flows use maestro-flows.
Install with skills.sh (any agent)
npx skills add testland/qa --skill flutter-testingflutter-testing
Overview
Per flutter-testing-doc (opens in new window):
"Flutter uses a testing pyramid approach with three main categories":
The framework ships first-party tooling for all three layers.
When to use
Step 1 - Install
Flutter ships with flutter_test (in the SDK). For mocks:
# pubspec.yaml
dev_dependencies:
flutter_test:
sdk: flutter
integration_test:
sdk: flutter
mockito: ^5.4.4
build_runner: ^2.4.13Step 2 - Unit tests
Pure-Dart functions with mocked dependencies:
// test/cart_test.dart
import 'package:flutter_test/flutter_test.dart';
import 'package:my_app/cart.dart';
void main() {
group('Cart', () {
test('addItem increments count', () {
final cart = Cart();
cart.addItem(Item(sku: 'BOOK-001', qty: 1));
expect(cart.itemCount, 1);
});
test('addItem rejects negative qty', () {
final cart = Cart();
expect(
() => cart.addItem(Item(sku: 'BOOK-001', qty: -1)),
throwsA(isA<ArgumentError>()),
);
});
});
}Run:
flutter test test/cart_test.dart
flutter test # all tests
flutter test --coverage # produces coverage/lcov.infoThe LCOV output feeds lcov-analysis (in the qa-test-reporting plugin).
Step 3 - Widget tests
Per flutter-testing-doc (opens in new window), widget tests "verify the UI looks and interacts as expected":
// test/cart_screen_test.dart
import 'package:flutter/material.dart';
import 'package:flutter_test/flutter_test.dart';
import 'package:my_app/cart_screen.dart';
void main() {
testWidgets('CartScreen shows item count', (WidgetTester tester) async {
await tester.pumpWidget(MaterialApp(home: CartScreen(initialCount: 3)));
expect(find.text('3 items'), findsOneWidget);
expect(find.byKey(Key('add-to-cart-button')), findsOneWidget);
});
testWidgets('Tapping add button increments count', (WidgetTester tester) async {
await tester.pumpWidget(MaterialApp(home: CartScreen(initialCount: 0)));
await tester.tap(find.byKey(Key('add-to-cart-button')));
await tester.pump(); // rebuild after state change
expect(find.text('1 item'), findsOneWidget);
});
}tester.pumpWidget(...) mounts the widget tree. tester.pump() advances the frame; tester.pumpAndSettle() advances until no animations are pending.
Finders:
| Finder | Use |
|---|---|
find.byKey(Key(...)) | By Key (preferred for stable lookups). |
find.text("...") | By visible text (translation-fragile). |
find.byType(Widget) | By widget type. |
find.byIcon(Icons.x) | By Material icon. |
find.descendant(of:, matching:) | Nested matching. |
Step 4 - Integration tests
Per flutter-testing-doc (opens in new window), integration tests "test complete app or large app sections" on real devices.
// integration_test/checkout_flow_test.dart
import 'package:flutter_test/flutter_test.dart';
import 'package:integration_test/integration_test.dart';
import 'package:my_app/main.dart' as app;
void main() {
IntegrationTestWidgetsFlutterBinding.ensureInitialized();
testWidgets('checkout flow', (WidgetTester tester) async {
app.main();
await tester.pumpAndSettle();
await tester.tap(find.byKey(Key('login-button')));
await tester.pumpAndSettle();
await tester.enterText(find.byKey(Key('email-field')), 'qa-test@example.com');
// ... etc.
});
}Run:
# On a connected device or simulator/emulator
flutter test integration_test/checkout_flow_test.dartStep 5 - Mockito + build_runner
For mocks:
// test/cart_test.dart
import 'package:mockito/annotations.dart';
import 'package:mockito/mockito.dart';
import 'cart_test.mocks.dart'; // generated
@GenerateMocks([CartRepo])
void main() {
test('Cart loads from repo', () async {
final mockRepo = MockCartRepo();
when(mockRepo.getCart()).thenAnswer(
(_) async => Cart(items: [Item(sku: 'BOOK-001', qty: 1)]),
);
final cart = await mockRepo.getCart();
expect(cart.itemCount, 1);
verify(mockRepo.getCart()).called(1);
});
}Generate the *.mocks.dart files:
dart run build_runner build --delete-conflicting-outputsStep 6 - Coverage + reporting
flutter test --coverage # writes coverage/lcov.info
genhtml coverage/lcov.info -o coverage/html # human reportThe LCOV file feeds the same parser other plugins use (lcov-analysis) for cross-language coverage aggregation.
Step 7 - CI integration
jobs:
test:
runs-on: ubuntu-latest
steps:
- uses: actions/checkout@v5
- uses: subosito/flutter-action@v2
with:
channel: stable
- run: flutter pub get
- run: dart run build_runner build --delete-conflicting-outputs
- run: flutter test --coverage
- uses: codecov/codecov-action@v5
with:
files: coverage/lcov.info
integration-android:
runs-on: ubuntu-latest
steps:
- uses: actions/checkout@v5
- uses: subosito/flutter-action@v2
- uses: reactivecircus/android-emulator-runner@v2
with:
api-level: 34
script: flutter test integration_test/Per flutter-testing-doc (opens in new window), Flutter supports CI integration via "Fastlane / Travis CI / Cirrus CI / Codemagic / Bitrise / Appcircle / Patrol (for native platform interactions)."
Anti-patterns
| Anti-pattern | Why it fails | Fix |
|---|---|---|
| All tests as integration tests | Slow; fragile; hides per-layer issues per the pyramid. | Many unit + widget; few integration (Step 1 pyramid). |
find.text("...") for translatable strings | Translation breaks tests. | find.byKey(Key("...")) (Step 3). |
tester.pump() (single frame) for animations | Animation isn't done; assertion fires too early. | tester.pumpAndSettle() for animations. |
Skipping IntegrationTestWidgetsFlutterBinding.ensureInitialized() | Integration test won't bind; runtime errors. | Add as first line in main() (Step 4). |
Mock without @GenerateMocks (manual mock classes) | Tedious; drift when the SUT interface changes. | Use @GenerateMocks + build_runner (Step 5). |
| Coverage from integration tests only | Integration coverage is sparse; misses unit-level branches. | Coverage from flutter test (which runs unit + widget). |
Limitations
References
Related skills
appium-testing
Wires Appium for cross-platform mobile UI automation - uses the WebDriver protocol, picks a driver per platform (XCUITest for iOS, UiAutomator2 / Espresso for Android, Mac2 for macOS, Windows for desktop), authors tests in JS / Python / Java / Ruby / .NET, configures `desiredCapabilities`, runs against simulators / emulators / device farms. Use when a single test suite must cover both iOS and Android, or when the team's stack is multi-platform (iOS + Android + Mac + Windows).
detox-testing
Authors React Native E2E tests with Detox (Wix) - gray-box architecture (runs in-process with the app), `element(by.id|by.text|by.label)` matchers, `waitFor()` for explicit sync beyond Detox's automatic async tracking, Jest runner. Use when the app is React Native and speed matters. For Flutter use flutter-testing; for black-box cross-platform use appium-testing; for YAML-declarative flows use maestro-flows; for non-RN native use xcuitest-suite or espresso-suite.
espresso-suite
Authors Espresso UI tests for Android - uses `onView(withId(...)).perform(...).check(matches(...))`, leans on Espresso's automatic synchronization (no `Thread.sleep`), wires `IdlingResource` for app-specific async, runs via `./gradlew connectedAndroidTest` and parses the JUnit XML output. Use when an Android app needs UI tests in Google's first-party framework.
maestro-flows
Authors Maestro YAML flow files (`.maestro/*.yaml`) for mobile + web UI automation: declarative `tapOn`, `inputText`, `assertVisible`, `swipe`, supported targets (iOS, Android, Flutter, React Native, web), nested flow imports, JavaScript hooks for complex conditions. Use when the team has already chosen Maestro, is coming from an existing `.maestro/` directory, or explicitly wants YAML-declarative tests readable by non-engineers without a compile step. For framework selection or authoring tests in XCUITest / Espresso / Detox / Appium / Flutter, use a mobile driver-selection or per-flow mobile test-authoring step instead.
mobile-a11y-test-author
Authors native mobile accessibility tests covering iOS (Accessibility Inspector, XCUITest `performAccessibilityAudit()` introduced in iOS 17, VoiceOver label/trait/hint verification) and Android (Espresso `AccessibilityChecks.enable()`, Accessibility Scanner, TalkBack traversal, `contentDescription` labelling) with WCAG-aligned checks for element labels, 44pt/48dp touch targets, contrast ratios, and focus order. Use when an iOS or Android app needs automated and manual accessibility test coverage beyond what `xcuitest-suite` or `espresso-suite` provide.
mobile-device-matrix-toolkit
Dispatches mobile UI test runs across a 3-tier device matrix (smoke per-PR, regression per-merge, full farm at release) to control CI cost: generates per-target Appium capability configs from a central YAML, parallelises via GitHub Actions matrix strategy, and aggregates JUnit XML into a cross-device pass/fail table. Use when deciding which iOS / Android devices and OS versions to run tests on and at which stage (smoke / regression / full farm), not how to configure a specific test framework (for that, use xcuitest-suite, espresso-suite, etc.).
mobile-web-emulation-runner
Builds a workflow to run web E2E tests under mobile viewports + DPRs (device pixel ratios): Playwright's `devices` catalog (iPhone 15, Pixel 7), suite run per-device as matrix shards, per-device screenshots, mobile assertions (`.tap()`, viewport-conditional layout). Use when a responsive web app needs mobile-breakpoint regression without a real-device farm. Mobile WEB only - for native apps use appium-testing, detox-testing, or flutter-testing; for cross-shard aggregation use mobile-device-matrix-toolkit; for gesture sequences use touch-gesture-tester.
mobile-web-perf-budget
Pure-reference skill for mobile-web performance budgets - Core Web Vitals at the 75th percentile mobile (LCP ≤2.5s, INP ≤200ms, CLS ≤0.1; FID retired March 2024 in favor of INP), Lighthouse mobile profile config, per-route resource budgets (JS bundle, image weight, font load). Use as the team's reference for "what should the mobile perf gate enforce" - paired with `lighthouse-perf` (the runner) and `lighthouse-budget-author` (the per-route author).
touch-gesture-tester
Verifies touch-gesture handlers (tap, double-tap, long-press, swipe, pinch, rotate, pan) work as expected under both mobile-emulation (Playwright) and native (XCUITest / Espresso / Detox) - distinguishes "mouse click handler also fires on tap" from "real touch event fired with correct properties." Use when the app has bespoke gesture handlers (custom carousels, sliders, drag-drop, pull-to-refresh) and the team needs targeted gesture verification beyond generic UI assertions.
xcuitest-suite
Authors XCUIest UI tests for iOS / iPadOS / tvOS - uses the three-class XCUIApplication / XCUIElement / XCUIElementQuery pattern, sets accessibility identifiers on production code, runs via `xcodebuild test` with destination, parses the `xcresult` bundle. Use when an iOS app needs UI tests in Apple's first-party framework (no external runtime; native to Xcode).