restler-fuzzing
Runs stateful REST API fuzzing using Microsoft's RESTler - infers producer-consumer dependencies from an OpenAPI spec, drives sequences of requests (POST → GET → DELETE chains), and reports 5xx errors, resource leaks, and hierarchy violations. Wraps the canonical 4-stage workflow (compile → test → fuzz-lean → fuzz). Use when the API is stateful (resources are created, queried, modified, deleted) and Schemathesis's stateless fuzzing is missing the multi-step bugs.
Install with skills.sh (any agent)
npx skills add testland/qa --skill restler-fuzzingrestler-fuzzing
Overview
RESTler is a stateful REST API fuzzer that finds security and reliability bugs (restler-readme (opens in new window)). Its differentiator vs. stateless fuzzers like schemathesis-fuzzing is that it infers producer-consumer dependencies from the OpenAPI spec - if POST /resources returns an id and GET /resources/{id} accepts that id, RESTler sequences them in that order to reach deeper state.
When to use
If the API is stateless (search endpoints, calculator endpoints, report-generation endpoints), Schemathesis is sufficient and lighter to operate. RESTler shines on resource lifecycle APIs.
Install
Prerequisites per restler-readme (opens in new window): Python 3.12.8 and .NET 8.0.
From source
git clone https://github.com/microsoft/restler-fuzzer.git
cd restler-fuzzer
mkdir restler_bin
python ./build-restler.py --dest_dir "$(pwd)/restler_bin"(Per restler-readme (opens in new window).)
Via Docker (preferred for CI)
docker build -t restler .For one-off CI runs:
docker run --rm -v "$PWD/output:/output" restler ...The four-stage workflow
Per restler-readme (opens in new window):
Stage 1 - Compile
Generate a RESTler grammar from the OpenAPI spec. The grammar captures the producer-consumer dependencies RESTler will exploit during fuzzing.
restler compile --api_spec openapi.jsonOutput: Compile/grammar.py plus Compile/dict.json (a starter dictionary RESTler uses to seed parameter values).
Stage 2 - Test (smoke)
Run a single end-to-end pass to verify the spec, auth, and target URL are wired correctly. Measures endpoint coverage - what fraction of the API RESTler can reach with the current grammar / dictionary.
restler test --grammar_file Compile/grammar.py \
--dictionary_file Compile/dict.json \
--target_ip <api-host> \
--target_port 443 \
--use_sslIf endpoint coverage is below the team's threshold (often 80%+), stop and amend the dictionary or grammar before continuing.
Stage 3 - Fuzz-lean
One pass through every endpoint with default checkers active - fast bug discovery focused on the obvious failure modes.
restler fuzz-lean --grammar_file Compile/grammar.py \
--dictionary_file Compile/dict.json \
--target_ip <api-host> \
--target_port 443 \
--use_sslStage 4 - Fuzz (deep)
Aggressive breadth-first exploration. Run for a fixed time budget (hours to days for a comprehensive run).
restler fuzz --grammar_file Compile/grammar.py \
--dictionary_file Compile/dict.json \
--target_ip <api-host> \
--target_port 443 \
--use_ssl \
--time_budget 8.0 # hoursBug detection
Per restler-readme (opens in new window), RESTler reports two bug categories:
| Category | Trigger |
|---|---|
| 5xx errors | Any 5xx response is a bug; RESTler triages by URL pattern. |
| Checker violations | Targeted sequences look for resource leaks, hierarchy violations (e.g. accessing a resource after deletion), and use-after-free patterns. |
Each bug appears in RestlerResults/.../bug_buckets/ with a replay log - the exact sequence of requests that triggered it. Replay logs are deterministic - the bug reproduces on demand.
Authentication
RESTler doesn't bake in an auth strategy; for tokens, the canonical pattern is:
TOKEN=$(curl -s ... | jq -r .access_token)
echo "{\"restler_custom_payload_header\": {\"Authorization\": [\"Bearer $TOKEN\"]}}" > auth-dict.json
restler fuzz-lean ... --dictionary_file auth-dict.jsonFor OAuth flows that rotate tokens during a long fuzz run, supply a refresh script RESTler invokes periodically. See restler-readme (opens in new window) for the --token_refresh_command flag and cadence settings.
Output and triage
Results land under RestlerResults/ with Compile/, Test/, FuzzLean/, and Fuzz/ subtrees; each unique bug gets a bug_buckets/Bug_N/ folder holding a bug_replay_log.txt and bug_request.txt. The full directory layout is in references/triage-and-ci.md.
Per-bug triage:
CI integration
RESTler is not a per-PR tool by default - fuzz-lean takes 5-30 minutes typically; deep fuzz is hours. The canonical cadence:
| Cadence | Stage | Time budget | Trigger |
|---|---|---|---|
| Per-PR | Test only | <1 minute | Schema-validation smoke; fail fast. |
| Nightly | Fuzz-lean | 30-60 minutes | New endpoint regression scan. |
| Weekly | Fuzz | 4-12 hours | Deep state-machine exploration. |
| Pre-release | Fuzz | 24-72 hours | Final security / reliability gate. |
The nightly cadence runs on a schedule: cron trigger: build the RESTler Docker image, compile the grammar from openapi.json, run fuzz-lean against staging, upload RestlerResults/ as an artifact (if: always()), then fail the job when any bug_replay_log.txt exists (find ... | wc -l). The complete GitHub Actions workflow is in references/triage-and-ci.md.
Anti-patterns
| Anti-pattern | Why it fails | Fix |
|---|---|---|
| Running RESTler on production | Generated requests mutate live data; 5xx alerts spam oncall. | Always target staging; production is for runtime monitoring, not fuzz traffic. |
| Skipping Stage 2 (Test) | Spec-vs-impl drift is invisible until Stage 4 wastes hours. | Always run Test first; check coverage before fuzz-lean. |
| Stage 4 (Fuzz) on every PR | Hours-long PR CI; no team accepts that. | Fuzz is nightly / weekly only. |
| Triaging bugs without replay-log confirmation | Some bugs are environmental (test DB state); confirm reproducibility. | Always run restler replay on each bug before opening a ticket. |
| Letting bug counts grow unbounded | Backlog of unfixed bugs becomes noise; team learns to ignore RESTler reports. | Treat each bug as a P1 / P2 ticket; fix or document waiver per the team's escape-defect policy. |
Limitations
References
RESTler output tree and nightly CI workflow
View source (opens in new window)RESTler output tree and nightly CI workflow
Companion to the restler-fuzzing skill: the full results directory layout and the complete nightly GitHub Actions workflow. Sourced from restler-readme (opens in new window).
Output tree
RestlerResults/
Compile/
grammar.py
dict.json
Test/
coverage_failures_to_investigate.txt
bug_buckets/
FuzzLean/
bug_buckets/ # one folder per unique bug pattern
Bug_1/
bug_replay_log.txt
bug_request.txt
Fuzz/
bug_buckets/
progress/Nightly CI workflow (GitHub Actions)
# .github/workflows/restler-nightly.yml
name: restler-nightly
on:
schedule:
- cron: '0 2 * * *' # nightly at 02:00 UTC
workflow_dispatch:
jobs:
fuzz-lean:
runs-on: ubuntu-latest
timeout-minutes: 90
steps:
- uses: actions/checkout@v5
- name: Build RESTler image
run: docker build -t restler ./.restler/
- name: Compile grammar
run: |
docker run --rm -v "$PWD:/work" restler \
compile --api_spec /work/openapi.json
- name: Fuzz-lean
env:
API_TOKEN: ${{ secrets.STAGING_API_TOKEN }}
run: |
docker run --rm -v "$PWD:/work" \
-e API_TOKEN="$API_TOKEN" \
restler fuzz-lean \
--grammar_file /work/Compile/grammar.py \
--dictionary_file /work/Compile/dict.json \
--target_ip staging.example.com \
--target_port 443 \
--use_ssl
- name: Upload bug buckets
if: always()
uses: actions/upload-artifact@v4
with:
name: restler-results
path: |
RestlerResults/
retention-days: 30
- name: Fail if bugs found
run: |
BUG_COUNT=$(find RestlerResults -name 'bug_replay_log.txt' | wc -l)
if [ "$BUG_COUNT" -gt 0 ]; then
echo "::error::RESTler found $BUG_COUNT bug(s) - see artifacts"
exit 1
fiRelated skills
api-chaos-runner
Runs the project's existing API tests under injected network chaos - latency, timeouts, dropped connections, bandwidth caps, packet loss - via Toxiproxy (notes on Pumba / Gremlin / LitmusChaos). Builds a per-scenario chaos matrix and reports which assertions break under which conditions, verifying resilience patterns (retry, circuit-breaker, timeout, fallback). Unlike schemathesis-fuzzing and restler-fuzzing, which generate new tests from a schema, this drives your EXISTING example-based suite.
karate-testing
Authors Karate `.feature` files using its Gherkin-flavored DSL for HTTP API tests, leverages the `match` keyword with fuzzy validators (#number / #string / #regex / contains / arrays), runs the suite via JUnit 5 plus Maven Surefire, and produces JUnit XML for CI gating. Use when the project is on the JVM and prefers a feature-file authoring flow over Java-DSL fluent chains; for those fluent chains use restassured-testing, for the same YAML-style flow on a Python/pytest stack use tavern-testing.
postman-collections
Repairs Postman and Newman runs in CI - a reporter that never writes the HTML file the pipeline expects, a nightly job that fires requests as fast as it can until a partner API rate-limits it, or a report with one row per request when the collection asserts a dozen things between them. Authors Postman collections (requests, tests, variables, environments), runs them headless via the Newman CLI, configures reporters (cli / json / junit / html) for CI artifact upload, and drives data-driven runs from JSON / CSV iteration files. Use when HTTP API tests are authored in Postman and need to run, pace themselves, and report correctly in CI.
restassured-testing
Strengthens and speeds up JVM API test suites - assertions so loose that an empty `200 OK` passed for three days, a 220-test suite spending fourteen minutes mostly waiting on sequential HTTP calls, or endpoints exercised through a hand-rolled JDK HTTP client with JSON parsed by hand. Authors REST Assured (Java) tests in the given().when().then() BDD-style DSL: status code and JSON / XML path assertions, authentication (Basic, OAuth2, API key), Maven / Gradle dependencies, JUnit 5 execution, and Surefire / JaCoCo reports for CI gating. Use when the project is on the JVM and its API tests miss real assertions, run too slowly, or are written by hand.
schemathesis-fuzzing
Generates property-based API tests automatically from an OpenAPI 2/3.x or GraphQL schema using Schemathesis, runs them via the `schemathesis run` CLI or as a pytest decorator, configures the canonical checks (status_code_conformance, response_schema_conformance, content_type_conformance, response_headers_conformance, not_a_server_error), and gates CI on schema-conformance failures plus 5xx detection. Use when the project ships an OpenAPI or GraphQL schema and the team wants schema-driven coverage that scales as the API evolves.