vwo-test
Wraps VWO (Visual Website Optimizer) SDK testing patterns: SDK initialization with the settings file (offline-capable), `getFeatureVariableValue` and `activate` API, force-bucketing for per-test assignment, and assignment-integrity tests against the bucketing algorithm. Use when writing tests for VWO-instrumented application code.
Install with skills.sh (any agent)
npx skills add testland/qa --skill vwo-testvwo-test
Overview
The VWO (Visual Website Optimizer) server-side SDK uses a settings file (equivalent to Optimizely's datafile) for offline-capable testing. Per developers.vwo.com (opens in new window), the SDK supports multiple languages with a common API: activate, get_feature_variable_value, is_feature_enabled, track, push.
When to use
Authoring
Install
pip install vwo-python-sdk
npm install --save-dev vwo-node-sdkSettings-file-based init
import json
import vwo
with open("tests/fixtures/vwo-settings.json") as f:
settings = json.load(f)
client = vwo.launch(settings, is_development_mode=True)is_development_mode=True disables event tracking to VWO servers - fully-offline tests.
Activate an experiment / variation
def test_get_variation_for_user():
variation_name = client.activate("checkout-experiment", "user-1")
assert variation_name in ("Control", "Variation-1")Feature variable
def test_feature_variable_value():
value = client.get_feature_variable_value("checkout-experiment", "button_color", "user-1")
assert value in ("blue", "green")Force-bucket a user
VWO doesn't have a direct "force decision" API like Optimizely; the canonical approach is to construct user IDs that hash into specific buckets - or use the SDK's userPreSegment callback where supported.
Per VWO docs, the bucketing is deterministic on the user ID. Tests rely on this:
def test_specific_user_id_in_treatment():
# User IDs are bucketed deterministically; pre-compute and pin
KNOWN_TREATMENT_USER = "test-user-treatment-12345"
variation = client.activate("checkout-experiment", KNOWN_TREATMENT_USER)
assert variation == "Variation-1"A pre-test step generates user IDs and records their bucket assignments in a fixture; tests reference the fixture.
Assignment integrity tests
def test_same_user_always_same_variation():
v1 = client.activate("expt", "user-1")
v2 = client.activate("expt", "user-1")
assert v1 == v2
def test_bucketing_is_uniform():
counts = {"Control": 0, "Variation-1": 0}
for i in range(10000):
v = client.activate("expt", f"user-{i}")
if v: counts[v] += 1
# 50/50 split → within a few percent
ratio = counts["Variation-1"] / sum(counts.values())
assert 0.48 < ratio < 0.52The bucketing-uniformity test is also a unit-level SRM check per ab-test-validity-checklist Step 2.
Event tracking
def test_conversion_tracked():
client.activate("expt", "user-1")
success = client.track("expt", "user-1", "checkout_completed")
assert successRunning
pytest tests/vwo/CI integration
jobs:
vwo-tests:
runs-on: ubuntu-latest
steps:
- uses: actions/checkout@v5
- uses: actions/setup-python@v5
- run: pip install vwo-python-sdk
- run: pytest tests/vwo/Anti-patterns
| Anti-pattern | Why it fails | Fix |
|---|---|---|
| Live-mode tests with real account | Pollutes prod analytics | is_development_mode=True |
| Settings-file not committed | Tests flake on schema changes | Commit fixture; refresh deliberately |
| User IDs that hash into one bucket only | False sense of "covering both arms" | Verify via bucketing-uniformity test |
| Skipping conversion-tracking test | Track-event regressions silent | Test track() success |
| Different settings files in dev vs CI | Behaviour diverges | Single fixture |
| Tests not isolated per experiment | Cross-experiment bucketing leak | Per-test client teardown |
Limitations
References
Related skills
ab-test-validity-checklist
Workflow skill that builds an A/B-test validity checklist from an experiment proposal, walking the canonical design-correctness gates - pre-registered OEC/power/guardrails, randomization unit + SRM check, assignment integrity, telemetry, peeking discipline, novelty/primacy, post-experiment SRM re-check - into a per-experiment checklist + sign-off form. Use when launching, auditing, or governing an experiment. For pitfall mechanics use guardrail-metrics-reference or peeking-problem-reference; to read an already-valid result use experiment-results-interpreter; for per-SDK harness tests use optimizely-test or statsig-test - this gates DESIGN, not SDK code.
amplitude-experiment-test
Wraps Amplitude Experiment SDK testing patterns: client initialization with API key (or a bootstrapped local flag config for offline tests), the fetch / variant API, exposure-event suppression in tests, and assignment-integrity tests. Use when writing tests for code that uses Amplitude Experiment for A/B testing or flag management.
experiment-results-interpreter
Interprets the results of a valid online controlled experiment, one whose harness, SRM, and telemetry have already been confirmed. Covers the distinction between practical and statistical significance, reading confidence intervals instead of binary p-values, novelty and primacy week-over-week decay that causes post-ship reversion, interaction effects from concurrent experiments, Simpson's paradox in segmented results, and the ordered guardrail-check sequence required before a ship decision. Use when a data scientist or PM is ready to draw conclusions from an experiment whose telemetry and randomisation have already passed the ab-test-validity-checklist. Distinct from ab-test-validity-checklist (harness setup and SRM detection) and from interaction-effect overlap auditing during experiment design.
guardrail-metrics-reference
Pure-reference catalog of guardrail-metric methodology for online controlled experiments. Defines guardrail metrics (metrics that must NOT degrade for an experiment to ship, even if the primary metric improves), the standard guardrail set (latency / errors / engagement / opt-out), the relationship to OEC (Overall Evaluation Criterion) per Kohavi et al., and pre-commitment of the metric set. The quantitative evaluation mechanics (per-metric alert/block thresholds, Bonferroni / Benjamini-Hochberg multiple-comparison correction) live in references/. Use when designing the metric set for a new experiment, auditing existing experiment configs, or reviewing experiment results before ship-decisions.
optimizely-test
Wraps Optimizely Feature Experimentation SDK testing patterns - client init from a fixture datafile (offline-friendly), the decide / decideAll v5 API, forced-decisions for per-test arm pinning (fixing which variation a user gets), OptimizelyUserContext + activate/track events, assignment-integrity (deterministic bucketing) tests. Use when writing A/B tests or feature-flag tests for Optimizely-instrumented application code. For another experimentation SDK use the matching harness - statsig-test, vwo-test, amplitude-experiment-test, or split-io-test; for experiment DESIGN gates not SDK code use ab-test-validity-checklist.
peeking-problem-reference
Pure-reference catalog of the peeking problem in online A/B testing. Defines the problem (repeatedly looking at experiment results inflates the false-positive rate above the declared alpha because each look is a separate test), the canonical mitigations (fixed-horizon test with pre-declared sample size; sequential testing with alpha-spending functions e.g., O'Brien-Fleming, Pocock; always-valid inference / mSPRT per Johari et al.), and the policy choices (data-peek schedule, stop-early thresholds, decision-time guard rails). Use when designing an experimentation platform's stop-early policy or auditing why a result was declared significant.
split-io-test
Wraps Split.io (Harness FME) SDK testing patterns: hermetic localhost/offline mode with an in-memory features map (JavaScript/browser) or a YAML fixture file (Node.js server-side), getTreatment and getTreatmentWithConfig evaluation, the SDK_READY event and whenReady() promise, impression listener verification, sync.impressionsMode configuration, and CI setup. Use when writing tests for application code instrumented with the Split.io or Harness Feature Management & Experimentation SDK.
statsig-test
Wraps Statsig SDK testing patterns - server-side statsig.initialize with an API key, gate / experiment / dynamic-config evaluation (checkGate, getExperiment, getConfig), local-evaluation offline mode, overrideGate / overrideConfig to force a user into an arm, assignment-integrity tests. Use when writing tests for Statsig-instrumented application code. For another experimentation SDK use the matching harness - optimizely-test, vwo-test, amplitude-experiment-test, or split-io-test; for experiment DESIGN gates not SDK code use ab-test-validity-checklist.