Overview
The Core Web Vitals are Google's three canonical user-experience metrics (web-vitals (opens in new window)):
| Metric | Measures | "Good" threshold |
|---|---|---|
| LCP (Largest Contentful Paint) | Loading performance | ≤ 2.5 seconds |
| INP (Interaction to Next Paint) | Interactivity | ≤ 200 milliseconds |
| CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift) | Visual stability | ≤ 0.1 |
INP became a stable Core Web Vital in 2024, replacing FID (web-vitals (opens in new window)). The canonical measurement standard is the 75th percentile of page loads, segmented across mobile and desktop (web-vitals (opens in new window)).
This skill covers Lighthouse CI (@lhci/cli) - the official Google Chrome team tool for running Lighthouse on every PR and asserting against budgets (lhci (opens in new window)).
When to use
If the project is a backend API or a CLI tool, this skill doesn't apply - use k6-load-testing or a sibling load runner for backend perf.
Install
npm install --save-dev @lhci/cli(Per lhci (opens in new window); the docs reference @lhci/cli@0.15.x as the current major.) Pin to a specific minor in CI for determinism.
Configure
Create .lighthouserc.js (or .lighthouserc.json) at the project root. The canonical shape per lhci (opens in new window):
module.exports = {
ci: {
collect: {
// What to audit
url: [
'http://localhost:3000/',
'http://localhost:3000/dashboard',
'http://localhost:3000/pricing',
],
// How many runs per URL - median report wins; 3 is canonical for stability
numberOfRuns: 3,
// Lighthouse settings
settings: {
preset: 'desktop', // or 'mobile' (default)
chromeFlags: '--no-sandbox', // CI-runner-friendly
},
// Use a static-server when running headless in CI
startServerCommand: 'npm run start',
startServerReadyPattern: 'ready on',
},
assert: {
// Canonical Web Vitals budgets per web.dev/articles/vitals
assertions: {
'largest-contentful-paint': ['error', { maxNumericValue: 2500 }], // 2.5s
'interaction-to-next-paint': ['error', { maxNumericValue: 200 }], // 200ms
'cumulative-layout-shift': ['error', { maxNumericValue: 0.1 }], // 0.1
// Lighthouse category scores (0-1)
'categories:performance': ['warn', { minScore: 0.9 }],
'categories:accessibility': ['error', { minScore: 0.95 }],
'categories:best-practices': ['warn', { minScore: 0.9 }],
},
},
upload: {
// Where to upload the .json reports for trend analysis
target: 'temporary-public-storage', // or 'lhci' for self-hosted server
},
},
};Assertion levels per lhci (opens in new window):
Running
The canonical invocation per lhci (opens in new window):
lhci autorunautorun runs three phases in sequence:
For finer control, the phases can run independently: lhci collect, lhci assert, lhci upload.
Running specific URLs
For a single PR-relevant audit:
lhci collect --url=http://localhost:3000/dashboard --numberOfRuns=3
lhci assertCI integration
# .github/workflows/lighthouse.yml
name: lighthouse
on:
pull_request:
paths:
- 'src/**'
- 'package.json'
- 'package-lock.json'
jobs:
lighthouse:
runs-on: ubuntu-latest
steps:
- uses: actions/checkout@v5
- uses: actions/setup-node@v4
with:
node-version: '20'
cache: 'npm'
- run: npm ci
- name: Build
run: npm run build
- name: Lighthouse CI
env:
LHCI_GITHUB_APP_TOKEN: ${{ secrets.LHCI_GITHUB_APP_TOKEN }} # optional, for PR comments
run: npx lhci autorun
- name: Upload Lighthouse reports
if: always()
uses: actions/upload-artifact@v4
with:
name: lighthouse-reports
path: .lighthouseci/
retention-days: 14The optional LHCI_GITHUB_APP_TOKEN (set up via the Lighthouse CI GitHub App) enables PR comments showing the per-metric delta vs. the main branch's last green run.
Authoring budgets
Budget authoring is part of Lighthouse CI configuration: picking per-route LCP / INP / CLS thresholds by traffic class, resource-size caps in budget.json, the assertMatrix config shape, and how to validate a new budget against production before committing it, are all in references/budgets.md. Start there when the project has no budgets yet or the existing ones need a redesign.
Mobile vs desktop budgets
LCP / INP thresholds are the same across mobile and desktop, but mobile is consistently slower in practice - the same JS bundle runs on a less-powerful CPU over a less-stable network.
Common pattern: separate .lighthouserc.mobile.js and .lighthouserc.desktop.js, run both in CI. The mobile run uses preset: 'mobile' (default) which applies CPU + network throttling to simulate a mid-range Android device.
# Run both
LHCI_BUILD_CONTEXT__GITHUB_BASE_URL=https://github.com/... \
npx lhci autorun --config=.lighthouserc.mobile.js
npx lhci autorun --config=.lighthouserc.desktop.jsAnti-patterns
| Anti-pattern | Why it fails | Fix |
|---|---|---|
numberOfRuns: 1 | Single-run measurements are noisy; flaky alerts. | Use 3 (canonical) or 5 for high-stakes pages; LHCI uses the median. |
Asserting on first-input-delay (FID) | FID was retired in 2024 (web-vitals (opens in new window)). | Use interaction-to-next-paint (INP). |
| Hard error on every metric out of the box | Existing pages may not meet thresholds; team learns to ignore the gate. | Start with warn for everything; promote to error once green for 2 weeks. |
| Auditing only the homepage | The homepage is usually the most-optimized page; misses regressions on long-tail routes. | Audit a representative URL set: home + 1 logged-in dashboard + 1 long-form content + 1 form-heavy. |
| Lighthouse score as the sole metric | Lighthouse score conflates multiple subscores; doesn't isolate which Web Vital regressed. | Assert on the individual Web Vitals (largest-contentful-paint, interaction-to-next-paint, cumulative-layout-shift); category score is supplementary. |
| Running against production | Lighthouse fires real network requests and triggers analytics; pollutes prod metrics. | Always against staging or a local build. |
Lab vs field
Lighthouse CI measures lab data (synthetic; deterministic runner). Field data (real-user metrics, RUM) is measured by Web Vitals JS in production. Both matter:
| Source | Tool | Use for |
|---|---|---|
| Lab (synthetic) | Lighthouse CI | Per-PR regression gate. |
| Field (RUM) | web-vitals library + analytics | Real-user 75th-percentile tracking. |
Lighthouse CI catches per-PR regressions; field data tracks the 75th-percentile threshold per web-vitals (opens in new window). Don't substitute one for the other.
References
Drafting a .lighthouserc.js assertion config and a budget.json resource-size budget at design time, so the Lighthouse CI runner has something meaningful to assert against. Without this workflow, teams either (a) set every threshold to the "good" default and ignore route-specific reality, or (b) pick thresholds via guesswork. Either ends with a gate the team disables.
The two artifacts:
Step 1 - Inventory the routes
For each route to be audited:
| Field | Notes |
|---|---|
| URL pattern | The actual URL or a representative one. |
| Traffic class | cached / dynamic / api-heavy / form-heavy / media-heavy. |
| Auth state | public / logged-in (auth state changes the JS bundle). |
| Cache TTL | Static assets duration. |
| User-tier traffic | What % of traffic does this route account for? Drives strictness. |
The URL set should cover the team's high-traffic routes plus any known-slow long-tail page. Don't audit every URL - pick representatives.
Step 2 - Pick LCP / INP / CLS thresholds per route
Start from the canonical Web Vitals "good" thresholds (LCP ≤2.5s, INP ≤200ms, CLS ≤0.1) and adjust per traffic class:
| Traffic class | LCP target | INP target | CLS target | Reasoning |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cached (CDN-served, mostly static) | ≤1.5s | ≤100ms | ≤0.1 | The default is too lenient; cached pages should be fast. |
| Dynamic (per-user content) | ≤2.5s | ≤200ms | ≤0.1 | Default thresholds. |
| API-heavy (waterfall of fetches) | ≤3.0s | ≤200ms | ≤0.1 | Acknowledge real-world latency; tighten elsewhere. |
| Form-heavy (input + validation) | ≤2.5s | ≤100ms | ≤0.05 | INP matters more - every keystroke is an interaction. CLS strict because forms must not jump. |
| Media-heavy (images / video) | ≤2.5s | ≤200ms | ≤0.1 | LCP via priority hints + loading=eager on hero. |
For a team's first pass, start lenient (Web Vitals defaults across the board) and tighten one route at a time as evidence accumulates that the route is consistently faster than the default.
Step 3 - Pick resource-size budgets
A resource-size budget caps the total bytes per resource type. The canonical Lighthouse "good" defaults for a non-media-heavy public page:
| Resource type | Suggested budget | Notes |
|---|---|---|
script | 300 kb | Compressed JS bundle (gzip / brotli). Tighten to 150kb for marketing pages. |
stylesheet | 100 kb | CSS only. Most projects fit easily. |
image | 500 kb | Per page - adjust upward for media-heavy. |
font | 100 kb | Subset fonts; use variable fonts when possible. |
total | 1500 kb | Page total; CDN-cached or not. |
For Single-Page Apps where the JS bundle is the load-bearing cost, the JS budget is the most important. Subpaths (route chunks) keep this tractable as the app grows.
Step 4 - Emit lighthouserc.js
A representative config that lives at the project root:
// .lighthouserc.js
module.exports = {
ci: {
collect: {
url: [
'http://localhost:3000/', // marketing home (cached)
'http://localhost:3000/pricing', // marketing pricing (cached)
'http://localhost:3000/dashboard', // logged-in dynamic
'http://localhost:3000/orders/new', // form-heavy
],
numberOfRuns: 3,
settings: {
preset: 'desktop',
chromeFlags: '--no-sandbox',
budgetPath: './budget.json', // resource-size budget
},
startServerCommand: 'npm run start',
startServerReadyPattern: 'ready on',
},
assert: {
assertMatrix: [
// Cached marketing pages - strict
{
matchingUrlPattern: '^http://[^/]+/(pricing)?$',
assertions: {
'largest-contentful-paint': ['error', { maxNumericValue: 1500 }],
'interaction-to-next-paint': ['error', { maxNumericValue: 100 }],
'cumulative-layout-shift': ['error', { maxNumericValue: 0.1 }],
},
},
// Dynamic logged-in pages - defaults
{
matchingUrlPattern: '/dashboard',
assertions: {
'largest-contentful-paint': ['error', { maxNumericValue: 2500 }],
'interaction-to-next-paint': ['error', { maxNumericValue: 200 }],
'cumulative-layout-shift': ['error', { maxNumericValue: 0.1 }],
},
},
// Form-heavy pages - strict CLS
{
matchingUrlPattern: '/orders/new',
assertions: {
'largest-contentful-paint': ['error', { maxNumericValue: 2500 }],
'interaction-to-next-paint': ['error', { maxNumericValue: 100 }],
'cumulative-layout-shift': ['error', { maxNumericValue: 0.05 }],
},
},
],
},
upload: { target: 'temporary-public-storage' },
},
};assertMatrix lets per-route assertions live in one config - easier to review than separate config files.
Step 5 - Emit budget.json
Lighthouse's resource-size budget format:
[
{
"path": "/*",
"resourceSizes": [
{ "resourceType": "script", "budget": 300 },
{ "resourceType": "stylesheet", "budget": 100 },
{ "resourceType": "image", "budget": 500 },
{ "resourceType": "font", "budget": 100 },
{ "resourceType": "total", "budget": 1500 }
],
"resourceCounts": [
{ "resourceType": "third-party", "budget": 10 }
]
},
{
"path": "/marketing/*",
"resourceSizes": [
{ "resourceType": "script", "budget": 150 },
{ "resourceType": "stylesheet", "budget": 50 },
{ "resourceType": "total", "budget": 800 }
]
}
]Per-path budgets allow stricter targets for marketing pages (where load time directly impacts conversion) than for logged-in app routes.
Step 6 - Validate the budget realistically
Before committing, run Lighthouse against current production with the new config:
LHCI_BUILD_CONTEXT__GITHUB_BASE_URL=... npx lhci collect --url=https://prod.example.com/
npx lhci assertExpect some failures - that's the point. The budget surfaces what needs work. Categorize the failures:
| Failure kind | Decision |
|---|---|
| Single-route outlier | File a perf-improvement ticket; relax the budget on this route only with a TODO. |
| Universal failure | The budget is too strict; relax to current p75 + 10%. |
| Budget violated only on mobile preset | Add a separate lighthouserc.mobile.js with looser mobile budgets. |
Never set a budget that always passes today - it'll never catch a regression.
Anti-patterns
| Anti-pattern | Why it fails | Fix |
|---|---|---|
| Same threshold for every route | Cached marketing page passes the same gate as a logged-in dashboard. | Use assertMatrix with per-route patterns. |
| Threshold = current production value | No room for a real regression to be caught. | Set threshold = current + 10% headroom; tighten over time. |
| Budgets in one mega-file with no per-path scope | Strict marketing budget falsely fails the dashboard. | Per-path budget objects. |
| Setting the threshold to the "Good" target on day one | Most production sites don't meet the targets out of the box; team disables the gate. | Land the gate at current production levels first; tighten the budget as a separate task. |
| Skipping the resource-size budget | Web Vitals catch the symptom (slow LCP); resource-size catches the cause (JS bundle bloat). | Both. They're complementary. |
References
- Ilya wants to cancel the real-user monitoring contract on 1 October
- Kerrisdale needs its first perf gate and the auditor is here on Friday
- The gate has been green for four months and /app/reports still takes nine seconds
- Fourteen months, zero catches - Marek wants the blocking-time assertion gone
- Nightly audit is pointed at the live storefront and growth found the sessions