Testland
Browse all skills & agents

sonarqube-rules

Configures and runs SonarQube / SonarCloud - multi-language SAST + Quality Gate platform with built-in Sonar Way rule profiles + custom rule plugins; integrates `sonar-scanner` with `sonar-project.properties` config; supports Quality Gate definitions including new-code-period blocking, branch + PR analysis, and per-issue suppression via `// NOSONAR` comment or `@SuppressWarnings("squid:RULE_ID")` annotation. Use when the user runs SonarQube Community / Developer / Enterprise edition or SonarCloud, or needs a multi-language SAST + code-quality platform with persistent issue tracking.

sonarqube-rules

Overview

Per github.com/SonarSource/sonarqube:

"SonarQube provides the capability to not only show the health of an application but also to highlight issues newly introduced."

The platform's distinguishing features vs Semgrep / CodeQL:

  • Quality Gate - pass/fail decision based on configurable threshold conditions (coverage on new code, duplication, security hotspots reviewed, maintainability rating, etc.).
  • New-code-period - issues are categorized as "new code" vs "overall code"; gates focus on new-code metrics so legacy debt doesn't block deploys.
  • Persistent issue tracking - server-side storage of issues across scans; status workflow (open / confirmed / resolved / false positive / won't fix).
  • Cross-language coverage - 30+ languages with one tool + unified UI.

When to use

  • Existing SonarQube deployment (Community / Developer / Enterprise / SonarCloud).
  • The team needs persistent issue tracking + Quality Gate workflow.
  • Multi-language coverage in one platform is a requirement.
  • New-code-period gating fits the team's deploy cadence.

For new projects without a SonarQube investment, evaluate semgrep-rules (lower friction; no server) first.

Step 1 - Install (server side)

Per docs.sonarsource.com/sonarqube-server:

Docker (most common for evaluation):

docker run -d --name sonarqube \
  -p 9000:9000 \
  sonarqube:lts-community

For production, consult sq-docs for Postgres + JVM sizing + reverse-proxy configuration. Default admin: admin / admin (change immediately).

Step 2 - sonar-scanner CLI

Download from docs.sonarsource.com/sonarqube-server "Analysis scanners". Place on PATH.

sonar-scanner \
  -Dsonar.projectKey=my-project \
  -Dsonar.sources=. \
  -Dsonar.host.url=http://localhost:9000 \
  -Dsonar.token=$SONAR_TOKEN

For Maven / Gradle / .NET, use the language-native scanner plugin (mvn sonar:sonar / ./gradlew sonar / dotnet sonarscanner).

Step 3 - sonar-project.properties config

Project-root file replaces -D flags:

# sonar-project.properties
sonar.projectKey=my-project
sonar.projectName=My Project
sonar.sources=src
sonar.tests=tests
sonar.exclusions=**/*.spec.ts,**/generated/**
sonar.sourceEncoding=UTF-8

# Coverage from external tool (Jest, JaCoCo, etc.)
sonar.javascript.lcov.reportPaths=coverage/lcov.info

# New-code-period (analysis scope)
sonar.newCode.referenceBranch=main

# Quality Gate (referenced by ID; created via UI/API)
sonar.qualitygate.wait=true

sonar.qualitygate.wait=true makes the scanner block until the gate decision is computed - critical for CI gating.

Step 4 - Quality Gate concept

The default "Sonar Way" gate enforces (consult your SonarQube UI at Quality Gates → Sonar Way for current conditions):

  • Coverage on New Code ≥ X%
  • Duplicated Lines on New Code ≤ Y%
  • Maintainability Rating on New Code = A
  • Reliability Rating on New Code = A
  • Security Rating on New Code = A
  • Security Hotspots on New Code reviewed = 100%

Custom gates can be defined via UI or REST API (/api/qualitygates/create).

Step 5 - Branch + PR analysis

For PR analysis (Developer edition+):

sonar-scanner \
  -Dsonar.pullrequest.key=$PR_NUMBER \
  -Dsonar.pullrequest.branch=$PR_BRANCH \
  -Dsonar.pullrequest.base=main

PR results post as comments to GitHub / GitLab / Bitbucket per the integration setup in SonarQube admin.

Step 6 - False-positive triage (MANDATORY)

Three suppression layers in priority order:

MechanismExampleWhen to use
Per-line NOSONARint x = 0; // NOSONAR justification textSingle-line exception with inline reason
Annotation@SuppressWarnings("squid:S106")Java/Kotlin per-block exception
Server-side mark-as-FPUI: Issues → Resolve as False PositivePersistent across scans; auditable
Server-side mark-as-Won't FixUI: Issues → Resolve as Won't FixAcknowledged risk; not a defect

Justification template (mandatory in code):

// NOSONAR squid:S106 - Reason: required for CLI tool stdout output
// Reviewer: alice@example.com (2026-05-15)
// Expires: 2026-12-15
System.out.println(message);

Server-side resolution requires a comment per SonarQube workflow config - make it mandatory in admin settings (Administration → Configuration → Issues → Comment required to set status).

Cadence: Issues → False Positive filter periodically; review for expiration. Server-side resolutions are persistent and auditable - the audit trail is the value over Semgrep's per-comment approach.

Step 7 - CI integration

jobs:
  sonarqube:
    runs-on: ubuntu-latest
    steps:
      - uses: actions/checkout@v5
        with: { fetch-depth: 0 }   # full history needed for new-code-period
      - uses: SonarSource/sonarqube-scan-action@v5
        env:
          SONAR_TOKEN: ${{ secrets.SONAR_TOKEN }}
          SONAR_HOST_URL: ${{ secrets.SONAR_HOST_URL }}
      - uses: SonarSource/sonarqube-quality-gate-action@v1
        timeout-minutes: 5
        env:
          SONAR_TOKEN: ${{ secrets.SONAR_TOKEN }}

fetch-depth: 0 is critical - without full git history, new-code-period detection is broken.

Step 8 - REST API integration

For automation / dashboards:

EndpointUse
GET /api/issues/search?projectKeys=...Issue list with filters
GET /api/qualitygates/project_statusCurrent gate verdict
POST /api/issues/do_transitionMark FP / Won't Fix
GET /api/measures/component_treePer-file metrics

API token via User → My Account → Security → Generate Tokens.

Anti-patterns

Anti-patternWhy it failsFix
fetch-depth: 1 in CINew-code-period broken; gates produce wrong decisionsAlways fetch-depth: 0 (Step 7)
Skip sonar.qualitygate.waitCI exits before gate evaluates; missed regressionssonar.qualitygate.wait=true (Step 3)
NOSONAR without justificationServer-side audit trail emptyRequired template (Step 6)
Custom Quality Gate without team buy-inGate fails on PRs no one understandsDocument gate definition; reference in PR template
Mass-resolve as FP without reviewBackdoor for skipping security findingsRequire comment + reviewer attribution (Step 6)

Limitations

  • SonarQube server requires hosting + maintenance; SonarCloud is the SaaS alternative.
  • Branch + PR analysis are Developer-edition+ features - Community edition only supports main branch.
  • Some language-specific deep-rule features require Developer or Enterprise edition.
  • New-code-period requires accurate git history; shallow clones break it.
  • License changed from LGPL to SSPL in 2024 - verify license compatibility for commercial use.

References