Testland
Browse all skills & agents

checkov-policy

Configures Checkov for IaC security scanning across Terraform, CloudFormation, Kubernetes, Helm, ARM, Serverless, AWS CDK - installs `pip install checkov`, runs against per-framework directories, customizes rules via skip / override / custom Python checks, integrates SARIF / JUnit output for CI dashboards. Per Checkov: "scans cloud infrastructure configurations to find misconfigurations before they''''re deployed." Use when adopting IaC security scanning against existing or legacy code: Checkov's --create-baseline / --baseline flags let CI gate only on new findings without requiring all legacy issues fixed first. Prefer over trivy-config when JUnit dashboard output or Python-based custom checks are needed.

checkov-policy

Overview

Per checkov-home, supported frameworks: Terraform and Terraform plan, CloudFormation, Kubernetes, Helm, ARM Templates, Serverless framework, AWS CDK. Checkov is the broadest IaC security scanner - covers more frameworks than tfsec (Terraform-only) or KICS (similar coverage but Checkov has more built-in checks per release).

When to use

  • Team uses any of the supported IaC frameworks.
  • Need security scanning for misconfigurations (open ports, unencrypted storage, overly broad IAM, etc.).
  • Want one tool covering Terraform + Kubernetes + Dockerfile + CI pipelines.

Step 1 - Install

pip install checkov
checkov --version

Per project (recommended for CI determinism):

echo 'checkov==3.2.500' >> requirements-dev.txt
pip install -r requirements-dev.txt

Step 2 - Run

# Scan a directory
checkov -d .

# Scan a specific Terraform file
checkov -f main.tf

# Scan multiple frameworks
checkov -d . --framework terraform,kubernetes,dockerfile

# Scan a Terraform plan (deeper analysis)
terraform plan -out=plan.tfplan
terraform show -json plan.tfplan > plan.json
checkov -f plan.json

Step 3 - Output formats

# Default (CLI)
checkov -d .

# JSON for parsing
checkov -d . -o json

# SARIF for code-scanning dashboards (GitHub Code Scanning)
checkov -d . -o sarif --output-file-path checkov.sarif

# JUnit XML for CI test reporting
checkov -d . -o junitxml > checkov.xml

# Multiple
checkov -d . -o cli -o sarif

Step 4 - Skip checks

# Skip specific checks
checkov -d . --skip-check CKV_AWS_18,CKV_AWS_20

# Skip a check class
checkov -d . --skip-check CKV_AWS_*

In code:

# main.tf
resource "aws_s3_bucket" "logs" {
  bucket = "my-logs"

  # checkov:skip=CKV_AWS_20:Public read access intentional for log distribution
}

The :skip= annotation requires a justification - reviewable in PRs.

Step 5 - Custom Python checks

# .checkov/custom_checks/cost_center_tag.py
from checkov.common.models.enums import CheckCategories, CheckResult
from checkov.terraform.checks.resource.base_resource_check import BaseResourceCheck

class CostCenterTagPresent(BaseResourceCheck):
    def __init__(self):
        super().__init__(
            name="Ensure all EC2 instances have a cost_center tag",
            id="CKV_CUSTOM_001",
            categories=[CheckCategories.GENERAL_SECURITY],
            supported_resources=['aws_instance'],
        )

    def scan_resource_conf(self, conf):
        tags = conf.get('tags', [{}])[0]
        if 'cost_center' in tags:
            return CheckResult.PASSED
        return CheckResult.FAILED

check = CostCenterTagPresent()
checkov -d . --external-checks-dir .checkov/custom_checks

For custom YAML policies (no Python required), use the graph-based policies/ directory (Checkov supports YAML rules).

Step 6 - Soft fail / hard fail

# Default: any failed check exits non-zero (CI fails)
checkov -d .

# Soft fail: log issues but exit 0 (informational)
checkov -d . --soft-fail

# Soft fail only on specific checks
checkov -d . --soft-fail-on CKV_AWS_*

Pattern: hard fail on critical / new findings; soft fail on legacy issues being ratcheted down.

Step 7 - Baseline comparison

# Generate baseline (current state of findings)
checkov -d . --create-baseline

# Use baseline (fail only on NEW findings vs baseline)
checkov -d . --baseline .checkov.baseline

Baselines let teams adopt Checkov against legacy code without fixing all existing issues at once - only new findings break the build.

Step 8 - CI integration

jobs:
  iac-security:
    runs-on: ubuntu-latest
    steps:
      - uses: actions/checkout@v5
      - uses: actions/setup-python@v5
        with: { python-version: '3.13' }
      - run: pip install checkov
      - name: Run Checkov
        run: checkov -d . --output sarif --output-file-path checkov.sarif --baseline .checkov.baseline
      - uses: github/codeql-action/upload-sarif@v3
        if: always()
        with:
          sarif_file: checkov.sarif

The SARIF upload to GitHub Code Scanning surfaces findings as PR comments + the Security tab.

Step 9 - Combine with other scanners

Checkov + tfsec + KICS catch overlapping but non-identical issues. Per iac-policy-checker: combine results to a unified verdict.

checkov -d . -o json > checkov.json
tfsec . -f json > tfsec.json
kics scan -p . --report-formats json -o ./kics-results
# Combined report via the iac-policy-checker agent

Anti-patterns

Anti-patternWhy it failsFix
Skipping all failed checks via --skip-checkDefeats security scanning.Per-check checkov:skip= with justification (Step 4).
Baseline never updatedLegacy issues never fixed; only-new gating becomes meaningless.Periodic baseline review + ratchet down.
Checkov as the only IaC scannerTool-specific gaps; some issues missed.Pair with tfsec / KICS (Step 9).
Ignoring SARIF / GitHub Security tabFindings invisible until someone runs the CLI.SARIF upload (Step 8).
Custom checks without testsCustom logic bugs let bad config through.Test custom checks (per OPA's opa test pattern).

Limitations

  • Per-framework rule depth varies. Terraform / Kubernetes have hundreds of rules; ARM / Serverless have fewer.
  • False positives common in early adoption. Use baseline to manage.
  • Performance on large repos. Checkov scans whole-tree; can take minutes.
  • Built-in rules may not match team policy. Custom checks for team-specific rules (Step 5).

References