Testland
Browse all skills & agents

payment-flow-states-reference

Pure-reference catalog of payment lifecycle state machines across Stripe, Adyen, PayPal, and Braintree: canonical states (created / requires_action / processing / succeeded / requires_capture / canceled / failed), authorisation vs capture, asynchronous webhook states, refund / dispute / chargeback transitions, and the 3-D Secure (EMVCo 3DS 2.x) frictionless / challenge flow paths with per-gateway 3DS test cards (references/3ds-flows.md). Use when designing tests for payment flows, auditing state-handling code, or covering a 3DS round-trip; this is the state model, not a builder - to author suites on it use payment-flow-test-author (refunds, disputes, webhook replay).

Install with skills.sh (any agent)

npx skills add testland/qa --skill payment-flow-states-reference
View source

payment-flow-states-reference

Overview

Every payment platform exposes a state machine - the PaymentIntent in Stripe, the Authorisation in Adyen, the Order in PayPal, the Transaction in Braintree. Each has different terminology for what is fundamentally the same lifecycle.

Per stripe.com/docs/payments/payment-intents (opens in new window): "The PaymentIntent encapsulates the lifecycle of a customer payment."

The full per-platform terminology grid, the per-provider state machines, and the async webhook / refund / dispute detail live in references/payment-state-machines.md.

When to use

  • Designing a payment-flow test suite.
  • Auditing state-handling code for a payment integration.
  • Mapping equivalent states across multiple providers.
  • Investigating "stuck payment" reports.

The canonical states

Most payment systems share the same conceptual lifecycle. The canonical states, in order:

  1. Created - intent exists, no payment method confirmed yet.
  2. Awaiting action - a 3DS or redirect challenge is pending.
  3. Processing - submitted, awaiting the async result.
  4. Authorized (not captured) - funds reserved; auth-only flows stop here.
  5. Captured / succeeded - funds transferred to the merchant.
  6. Failed - declined or rejected.
  7. Cancelled - voided before capture.
  8. Refunded - captured then reversed (async).
  9. Disputed / chargeback - customer's bank pulled the funds.

Each provider names these differently. The full canonical-to-provider grid and the four per-provider state machines (Stripe PaymentIntent, Adyen Authorisation/Capture, PayPal Order, Braintree Transaction) are in references/payment-state-machines.md.

Authorisation vs capture

Two-step:

  1. Authorize - bank reserves funds; merchant doesn't get them yet.
  2. Capture - funds transferred to merchant.

Default in most systems is auto-capture (auth + capture in one call). Separate auth-then-capture is used for:

  • Hold-then-charge flows (rental cars, hotels).
  • Inventory-confirm-before-charge.
  • Manual fraud review.

Per stripe.com/docs/payments/capture (opens in new window): PaymentIntent with capture_method=manual requires explicit capture call.

How to use

  1. Identify the platform and flow - which provider, and whether it is auth-only or auth+capture (see Authorisation vs capture).
  2. Map its state machine from references/payment-state-machines.md - translate the canonical states into that provider's terminology.
  3. Enumerate the async transitions - the webhook states plus the refund, dispute, and chargeback transitions the flow can reach.
  4. Derive test cases per transition - one case per edge, happy and off-path (see State-handling test surface).
  5. Assert the state-handling code covers each - every transition the provider can emit has a handler and is webhook-driven, not inferred from the synchronous API return.

Worked example

Map a Stripe PaymentIntent lifecycle for a 3DS card that then gets refunded. The path: requires_payment_method -> requires_action -> processing -> succeeded, then a refund pending -> succeeded.

Test cases derived, one per transition:

TransitionTest case
requires_payment_method -> requires_actionConfirm with a challenge card; assert requires_action + next_action.type = redirect_to_url
requires_action -> processingComplete the issuer challenge; assert the intent leaves requires_action
processing -> succeededWait for payment_intent.succeeded webhook; assert final state (not the sync return)
succeeded -> refund pendingIssue a full refund; assert refund object pending
refund pending -> succeededWait for charge.refunded webhook; assert refund succeeded

Each async assertion waits on the webhook, so the same lifecycle exercised without 3DS (a frictionless card that skips requires_action) is a separate case, not a variant of this one.

Idempotency

Most payment APIs accept an Idempotency-Key header (Stripe, Adyen) or equivalent. The pattern: retry with the same key produces the same response.

Per stripe.com/docs/api/idempotent_requests (opens in new window): "Stripe supports idempotency for safely retrying requests without accidentally performing the same operation twice."

Tests should verify the merchant code uses idempotency keys for every mutating call.

State-handling test surface

SurfaceTest
Created → succeeded (happy path)Standard test-card; assert each state observed
Requires-action (3DS)Initiate with a challenge test card (Stripe (opens in new window) 4000 0027 6000 3184, Adyen (opens in new window) 4917 6100 0000 0000); assert requires_action / RedirectShopper with next_action.type = redirect_to_url; complete the issuer-hosted challenge; confirm and assert succeeded. Repeat with a frictionless card (Stripe 4000 0000 0000 3055) - must reach succeeded with no challenge. Per references/3ds-flows.md
Failed (insufficient funds)Use insufficient-funds test card; assert state
Cancelled before captureManual-capture + cancel; assert state
Webhook idempotencyReplay webhook twice; assert idempotent handling
Refund fullCapture + full refund; assert state sequence
Refund partialCapture + partial refund; assert state
Dispute wonTrigger dispute; respond; assert won
Dispute lostTrigger dispute; don't respond; assert lost

Anti-patterns

Anti-patternWhy it failsFix
Treating the API return as the final stateAsync; succeeded comes laterWait for webhook
No idempotency keyNetwork retries duplicate-charge customersAlways set idempotency
Hardcoded sleep waiting for webhooksFlakyPoll webhook endpoint or queue with timeout
Skipping the requires-action flow3DS regulations require it for most EU cardsAlways test 3DS path
Stale state stored locallyLocal DB diverges from platformWebhook-driven update
Trust the request-body statusWebhooks can be replayed by attackersVerify signature + idempotency
One test for all platformsState terminology differsPer-platform test suite
Refund tests in sync flowRefunds are asyncWebhook-based

Limitations

  • Platforms evolve. Stripe added the setup_intent for saved payment methods; PayPal's Orders API is newer than the legacy Payments API.
  • Regulatory states change. EU PSD2 introduced strong customer authentication; states evolved to support it.
  • Refund + dispute timelines. Real-world chargebacks take weeks; test environments shortcut this.

References

3-D Secure (3DS) test flows

View source (opens in new window)

3-D Secure (3DS) test flows

3-D Secure (3DS) is the EMVCo-specified card-authentication protocol. Per emvco.com (opens in new window), 3DS 2.x is the current spec (cite by stable ID: EMV 3-D Secure Protocol Specification v2.x); 3DS 1.0 is deprecated.

Use this reference when designing multi-gateway 3DS test coverage, auditing a 3DS redirect round-trip, or investigating a challenge-flow regression that is not gateway-specific.

The three flow outcomes

Per EMVCo 3DS 2.x spec:

OutcomeCustomer experienceLiability
FrictionlessNo challenge; issuer authenticates based on risk signalsShifts to issuer (in many regions)
ChallengeCustomer prompted (SMS, biometric, app)Shifts to issuer on success
Not applicable3DS not invoked (non-EU; merchant-initiated)Stays with merchant

The merchant's job: send all available data to the gateway; the gateway + issuer + 3DS server decide the flow.

SCA under PSD2

Per European Banking Authority RTS on SCA (opens in new window): since September 2019 (enforcement gradual through 2021), EU card payments require two-factor SCA (two of knowledge / possession / inherence). Exemptions: low-value (< €30), recurring, trusted-beneficiary, merchant-initiated - each with tracking requirements.

Per-gateway test cards

Per-PAN 3DS test cards for Stripe, Adyen, and Braintree, each with its source doc, are in gateway-test-cards.md (opens in new window). The core Stripe cards used in the assertions below: 4000 0000 0000 3055 (frictionless) and 4000 0027 6000 3184 (challenge).

Test flow surface

1. Merchant calls Authorize / PaymentIntent / Charge
2. Gateway returns "requires_action" / "RedirectShopper" / "PAYER_ACTION_REQUIRED"
   per the host SKILL.md state grid
3. Frontend redirects user to issuer-hosted 3DS challenge
4. User completes challenge (or auto-completes for frictionless)
5. Redirect back to merchant return URL
6. Merchant confirms PaymentIntent (or equivalent)
7. Gateway returns final state (succeeded / failed)

Test surface per step:

StepTest
1Initiate with each test card; assert state
2Frontend handles each gateway's "requires action" key correctly
3Redirect URL is built with the gateway-provided client secret / token
4Issuer-hosted page is reachable (manual + Playwright e2e)
5Return URL handler parses the response correctly
6Confirm call is idempotent (per the host SKILL.md Idempotency section)
7Final state matches expected per test card

Frictionless vs challenge - testable assertions

test('frictionless authentication', async () => {
  // Card 4000 0000 0000 3055 in Stripe test mode
  const intent = await stripe.paymentIntents.create({
    amount: 1000, currency: 'eur',
    payment_method: 'pm_card_threeDSecure2Supported',
    confirm: true,
  });
  expect(intent.status).toBe('succeeded');  // No challenge needed
});

test('challenge flow', async () => {
  // Card 4000 0027 6000 3184
  const intent = await stripe.paymentIntents.create({
    amount: 1000, currency: 'eur',
    payment_method: 'pm_card_threeDSecure2Required',
    confirm: true,
    return_url: 'https://example.com/return',
  });
  expect(intent.status).toBe('requires_action');
  expect(intent.next_action.type).toBe('redirect_to_url');
});

Anti-patterns

Anti-patternWhy it failsFix
Skip 3DS in testsEU regulations require it; you'll discover broken at launchPer-gateway 3DS card battery
Test only happy pathChallenge failure path also mattersTest failure + cancel mid-challenge
No return-URL handler testRace conditions on redirect-back lostTest the full round-trip
Hardcoded redirect URL in production codeLocalhost in prodPer-environment config
Treat requires_action as failureIt's the normal mid-flow stateHandle explicitly
3DS 1 still in code pathsDeprecated since 2022Remove and test
One test for all gatewaysEach handles 3DS slightly differentlyPer-gateway
Sync expectation on async flowConfirm is asyncWait for webhook

Limitations

  • EMVCo 3DS spec is paywalled. Reference by stable ID; rely on gateway docs for test cards.
  • Issuer-hosted challenge UIs vary. Bank-specific design; test via e2e against gateway test mode.
  • SCA exemptions are policy + technical. Code must claim the right exemption + log the decision.
  • 3DS data fields are extensive. Each gateway has its own field names; per-gateway docs are authoritative.

Sources

Gateway 3DS test cards

View source (opens in new window)

Gateway 3DS test cards

Per-PAN test cards that drive 3DS challenge, frictionless, and bypass flows in each gateway's test mode. Cross-referenced from 3ds-flows.md (opens in new window). For single-gateway work, prefer the gateway skills (stripe-test-cards-and-webhooks, payment-gateway-sandboxes).

Stripe

Per docs.stripe.com/testing#regulatory-cards (opens in new window):

CardBehaviour
4000 0027 6000 3184Authentication required (challenge)
4000 0025 0000 3155Authentication required (challenge), payment failure after success
4000 0000 0000 3220Authentication required (challenge), payment success
4000 0000 0000 30553DS supported but not required (frictionless)
4242 4242 4242 4242Standard test card (no 3DS)

Adyen

Per docs.adyen.com/development-resources/test-cards-and-credentials/test-card-numbers (opens in new window):

CardBehaviour
4917 6100 0000 00003DS 2 challenge flow
5454 5454 5454 54543DS 2 frictionless
4012 8888 8888 18813DS 1 (deprecated; for migration testing)

Braintree

Per developer.paypal.com/braintree/docs/guides/3d-secure/testing/node (opens in new window):

CardBehaviour
4000 0000 0000 1091Authenticate via standard flow
4000 0000 0000 1109Frictionless
4000 0000 0000 1125Bypass (skipped)

Per-platform payment state machines

View source (opens in new window)

Per-platform payment state machines

Deep reference for payment-flow-states-reference SKILL.md. Consult when mapping the canonical lifecycle onto a specific provider, or when auditing that a state-handling integration covers every provider-specific state. The canonical-state names and the decision workflow stay in the SKILL; the full per-platform terminology grid, the per-provider state machines, and the async webhook / refund / dispute detail live here.

Per-platform terminology mapping

Every provider names the same lifecycle differently. This grid maps each canonical state to its provider-specific value.

Canonical stateStripeAdyenPayPalBraintree
Createdrequires_payment_methodReceivedCREATEDcreated
Awaiting action (3DS, etc.)requires_actionRedirectShopperPAYER_ACTION_REQUIREDn/a (handled inline)
ProcessingprocessingPendingPENDINGsubmitted_for_settlement
Authorized (not captured)requires_captureAuthorisedAPPROVED (no immediate capture)authorized
Captured / succeededsucceeded[Capture] SettledCOMPLETEDsettled
Failedfailed (charge)RefusedDECLINEDgateway_rejected / failed
CancelledcanceledCancelledVOIDEDvoided
Refundedsucceeded + refund object[Refund] SettledREFUNDEDrefunded
Disputed / chargebackdisputed (in dispute object)[Chargeback]disputedisputed

Per-platform state machines

Each provider exposes one primary object whose status field walks the lifecycle. Auth-only flows stop at the authorized state until an explicit capture; auth+capture flows run straight to the captured state.

Webhook event sequence

Providers emit one webhook per state transition; the async arrival is why tests must wait for the webhook, not the synchronous API return. Stripe example:

1. customer.created
2. payment_intent.created
3. payment_intent.requires_action   (if 3DS)
4. payment_intent.processing
5. payment_intent.succeeded
   AND
   charge.succeeded

Refund states

captured payment

   refund created (status: pending)

   refund succeeded (or failed)

Refunds are async: the API call returns immediately with pending, then a webhook delivers the final state minutes to hours later. Per docs.stripe.com/refunds (opens in new window).

Dispute / chargeback states

The most-complex part of the state machine. Per Visa's chargeback reason codes (cite by stable ID: Visa Chargeback Reason Codes), the customer's bank initiates the chargeback and the merchant has a fixed window to respond.

StateMeaning
InquiryBank requests info; not yet a chargeback
Pre-arbitrationInitial dispute filed
WonMerchant evidence accepted
LostMerchant evidence rejected; funds returned to customer
Pre-arbitration acceptedMerchant accepts the loss

Disputes resolve over weeks; test scenarios use test-mode dispute APIs to trigger the transitions synchronously. Per docs.stripe.com/disputes (opens in new window).

Related skills

payment-flow-test-author

Build-an-X workflow that authors the full payment-flow test suite in three phases: the refund matrix (full / partial / multiple-partials / over-refund / already-refunded, per-gateway APIs for Stripe, Adyen, PayPal, Braintree), the chargeback / dispute suite (Visa + Mastercard reason codes, evidence submission windows, won / lost / accepted dispositions), and webhook replay + recovery via gateway-native simulators (Stripe CLI trigger / resend, Adyen Customer Area resend, PayPal Webhook Simulator, Braintree sampleNotification). Driven by the state model in payment-flow-states-reference. Use when building refund, dispute, or payment-webhook-robustness coverage for a payment integration; for generic (non-payment) webhook receiver testing use webhook-delivery-tester in the qa-notifications plugin.

payment-gateway-sandboxes

Wraps the vendor-generic payment-gateway sandbox pattern - test credentials, sandbox base URLs / environment switches, deterministic test-card matrices, and gateway-native webhook simulators - with per-gateway references for Adyen test mode, PayPal Sandbox, and Braintree sandbox. Use when testing code integrated with Adyen, PayPal, or Braintree; for Stripe use stripe-test-cards-and-webhooks (one-time payments) or stripe-subscription-billing-test-author (recurring billing).

stripe-subscription-billing-test-author

Builds test suites for Stripe recurring-billing flows: trial-to-paid conversion, proration on plan upgrade and downgrade, dunning on failed renewal, cancel and reactivation, and the full subscription webhook event matrix (invoice.payment_failed, customer.subscription.updated, customer.subscription.deleted, invoice.paid). Uses Stripe Billing test clocks (POST /v1/test_helpers/test_clocks) to time-travel through billing cycles without calendar delay. Distinct from stripe-test-cards-and-webhooks (one-time PaymentIntents) and payment-flow-test-author (idempotency + replay robustness). Does not cover single-event CLI replay or handler idempotency testing (see payment-flow-test-author for those). Use when authoring tests for subscription or recurring-billing integrations.

stripe-test-cards-and-webhooks

Wraps Stripe API testing patterns: test-mode initialization, the canonical test cards (4242 success; 4000 0000 0000 0002 declined; 4000 0027 6000 3184 3DS challenge per the 3DS flows reference in payment-flow-states-reference), the Stripe CLI webhook flow (`stripe listen --forward-to`), the Stripe CLI fixture commands (`stripe trigger payment_intent.succeeded`), and the webhook signature verification (Stripe-Signature header + HMAC-SHA256). Use when testing Stripe-integrated code.